Apologies

I'm sorry that the previous entry is so long. When I started writing it, I thought to write it in "blog" form as I am doing. It was intended to be a narrative of a very bad experience, but in short readable clips.

The trouble with blogs is that they are posted from earliest to latest, and so that narrative became even more difficult to read as one would have to read it like the Orientals or Yiddish - back to front! So I thought I would reconstruct all the blogs into one long - very long - narrative.

But now I have gotten it out of my system. I have explained the case as it occurred. I was told by my brother-in-law that nothing written is done so without bias. And I agree. Certainly all newspaper articles and such have a bias, the writer's slant. We all have our feelings and unless they are staccato sentences, for the most part we cannot help but want to have the reader agree with our attitude.

Joe Friday could ask for "just the facts, ma'am", and we can list one after another and be closest to non-bias, but a narrative, for the most part, unfortunately does have a bias. I have tried my best to keep to the facts, and they can be substantiated, because the case/s are all a matter of Public Record. I wanted to make it readable and hope I have, but it therefore became quite lengthy.

So I apologize for the previous entry's length, and will try to keep the rest shorter. Hopefully MUCH shorter.

I am glad I have the opportunity to "speak my piece". And I hope to put into this blog, my reflections of experience and EXPERIENCES. Be patient with me. A friend noted I was likely a frustrated writer.

I'm probably a frustrated lot of things. But this Country, and computers, and blogs, and all the opportunities are available as never before to minimize those frustrations. We can vent now or showcase our case as never before. For that I am truly thankful.