More on the AZ ROC Website

Is there value in noting that at one time EVER, the license was SUSPENDED for lack of bond? Perhaps because of a clerical oversight?

I discovered (I think) that Complaints DROP OFF the website after two years. So a Contractor who had numerous complaints more than two yeas ago would appear to be clean in just over two years. Which could be good for the Contractor suggesting he is doing work RECENTLY that has not warranted any complaints.

But what would be the harm of having the consumer dig DEEPER into the background of Contractors, ONLY if they felt that they needed to make the effort? Easy to discover if a person is licensed or not, and for how long. More effort to dig deeper.

But that search revealing MORE information. Suspended but then rectified quickly, years ago. Complaints, when and how they were handled. Something more than a disclaimer.

If the purpose of the "licensing inquiry" is to make certain facts available to the public, then it should be done properly. Of course if the purpose is SOLELY to impact Contractors negatively, then leaving it the way it is will accomplish THAT goal!